ISO 27001 vs SOC 2
How they differ, which buyers ask for which, and which one a company in Vietnam or APAC should do first.
The short answer: ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
ISO 27001 is a certificate for your information security management system (ISMS), issued by an accredited certification body and valid for three years with surveillance audits at least once a year. SOC 2 is an attestation report on the controls of a service you deliver, issued by a licensed CPA firm under AICPA standards. Choose SOC 2 when US or Canadian customers ask for a SOC 2 report; choose ISO 27001 when buyers in Japan, the EU or the rest of APAC ask for a certificate, or when you want one management system for the whole organization. Companies that sell into both markets usually end up with both, built on one shared set of controls.
Buyers in Japan, the EU, Singapore and APAC; companies that want one security management system for the whole organization.
ISO 27001 with pTrackly →SaaS and IT service companies selling to US and Canadian enterprises.
SOC 2 with pTrackly →How do ISO 27001 and SOC 2 differ?
| Aspect | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | International standard for an ISMS (ISO/IEC 27001:2022) | AICPA attestation framework, reporting against the Trust Services Criteria |
| What you receive | ISO 27001 certificate (plus the auditor's report) | SOC 2 Type I or Type II report, usually shared under NDA |
| Who issues it | A certification body accredited by a national accreditation body (IAF member) | A CPA firm licensed by a US state board of accountancy, working under AICPA standards |
| Scope | The ISMS scope you define: organization, sites, services | The system behind a specific service, plus the Trust Services Categories you choose (Security is always included) |
| Requirements and controls | Clauses 4–10 plus 93 Annex A controls; exclusions justified in the Statement of Applicability | Common criteria CC1–CC9 for Security, plus Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity or Privacy criteria if chosen |
| How it is assessed | Stage 1 (documentation) and Stage 2 (operation) audits; no fixed observation period, but the ISMS must be running, including an internal audit and management review | Type I: control design at a point in time. Type II: design and operating effectiveness over a period, typically 3 to 12 months; the AICPA sets no minimum |
| Validity and cycle | Certificate valid for 3 years; surveillance audits at least once a year, then recertification | No official expiry; customers usually expect a report whose period ended within the last 12 months, so Type II is repeated yearly |
| What drives cost | Scope size (people, sites, systems), which sets the certification body's audit days; internal effort; tooling | Type I or II, period length, categories in scope, system complexity, the CPA firm; internal effort; tooling |
| Timeline (estimate) | Scope-dependent: readiness, then Stage 1 and Stage 2. pTrackly's own certification: 3 weeks of readiness + a 4-week audit (our case, not a promise) | Scope-dependent readiness; Type I after a point-in-time examination; Type II adds an observation period of typically 3 to 12 months |
| Who usually asks for it | Enterprise buyers and partners in Japan, the EU, Singapore and much of APAC; public tenders | US and Canadian enterprise buyers of SaaS and IT services |
Timelines are scope-dependent estimates, not promises. Cost depends on scope, the assessor and how ready you already are; independent audit fees are separate.
Should you choose ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
Choose ISO 27001 if...
- Buyers in Japan, Singapore or the EU ask for a certificate
- You deliver outsourcing or IT services to enterprise clients
- You want one management system for the whole organization, not just one service
- You plan to add ISO 42001 or ISO 27701, which share the same management-system structure
Choose SOC 2 if...
- US or Canadian customers ask for a SOC 2 report
- You sell B2B SaaS and buyers' vendor reviews ask for SOC 2
- You want the scope limited to one specific service
Do both if...
- You sell into both the US and Japan or the EU
- Customer security questionnaires ask for both
- You can run one control set through two audits
Can you do ISO 27001 and SOC 2 together?
Yes. Both rely on the same core security practices, so one control set can serve both audits. The difference is in the paperwork and the assessment: ISO 27001 adds the ISMS clauses (scope, risk treatment, Statement of Applicability, internal audit, management review); SOC 2 adds a system description and, for Type II, evidence that each control operated across the period.
pTrackly maps one control to several frameworks, so evidence collected once counts toward both ISO 27001 and SOC 2. Scope decisions, running the controls and the audits stay with your team, the certification body and the CPA firm.
Which first for a company in Vietnam or APAC?
| Where you sell | What buyers usually ask for | Start with |
|---|---|---|
| US, Canada (SaaS, IT services) | A SOC 2 report, usually Type II | SOC 2. Do Type I first if a deal needs evidence soon, then move to Type II |
| Japan | An ISO 27001 certificate (buyers can check ISMS-AC listings) | ISO 27001 |
| EU | Commonly ISO 27001; GDPR obligations are separate | ISO 27001, plus a GDPR program if you process personal data of people in the EU |
| Singapore and the rest of APAC | Commonly ISO 27001 | ISO 27001 |
| Unclear or mixed | Check the security questionnaires of your three largest prospects | Whichever unblocks the most revenue first, then reuse the controls for the other |
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between ISO 27001 and SOC 2?
ISO 27001 is a certificate for an organization's information security management system, issued by an accredited certification body and valid for three years. SOC 2 is an attestation report on a service's controls, issued by a licensed CPA firm under AICPA standards, with no official expiry date.
Which is harder, ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
ISO 27001 is heavier on the management system: scope, risk assessment, Statement of Applicability, internal audit and management review. SOC 2 Type II is heavier on evidence: every control needs proof that it operated across the whole period, typically 3 to 12 months.
Can you pursue ISO 27001 and SOC 2 at the same time?
Yes. Both rely on the same core practices, such as access control, change management, logging, incident response and vendor management, so one control set can serve both. What differs is the ISMS documentation for ISO 27001 and the system description plus period evidence for SOC 2.
Does ISO 27001 replace SOC 2 for US customers?
Usually not. US buyers who ask for SOC 2 want the CPA firm's report; some accept ISO 27001 with a completed security questionnaire, so ask the customer before you decide.
Which should a startup in Vietnam or APAC do first?
Follow the market: SOC 2 first for US and Canadian buyers, ISO 27001 first for Japan, the EU and Singapore. If the market is unclear, read your largest prospects' security questionnaires and start with the one that unblocks more revenue.
Related reading
Turn compliance knowledge into work that gets done
Get step-by-step AI guidance, automated evidence collection, and live control status in one workspace.
In the call, we map your framework, system scope, and how pTrackly fits your current workflow.
Does not replace an independent auditor or certification body.